2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant are that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake, and that the Defendant was an initial offender who had no record of criminal punishment.

However, the crime of this case committed by the defendant in collusion with other accomplices to operate entertainment centers for about seven months in the office of the head of the office and mediating commercial sex acts by employing women's commercial sex acts. In light of the crime method, contents, period of business, size of facilities, etc., the crime of this case is not easy.

Although the Defendant asserts that he was merely an employee, it is difficult to accept the above argument in light of the Defendant’s position and role.

In addition, sexual traffic brokerage business is a crime that disturbs women's sex and interferes with the establishment of a sound sexual culture and harms good morals, and it is also socially malicious.

In full view of such circumstances and other various conditions of sentencing as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, equity in punishment among accomplices, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too large.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.