2. The judgment of the defendant supports three children in economic difficult circumstances, while recognizing the crime of this case, which seriously reflects his mistake. However, even though the defendant was punished as a fine for the same kind of crime, he committed the crime of this case in the absence of two months. The crime of this case is that the defendant drives a vehicle in the state of drinking alcohol concentration of 0.087%, and the nature and circumstances of the crime are not easy, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., are considered to be too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.