2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant repents his mistake.

However, in light of the fact that the gross negligence of violating the duty to protect pedestrians at the crosswalk of the defendant, which caused the occurrence of the accident, the degree of the victim's injury caused by the crime of this case is not less than that of the defendant, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable, and therefore, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.