except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 4, 2020, at the main point in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on April 22 and 55, 2020, the Defendant: (a) stated that “any male does not pay the drinking value; and (b) he was urged to pay the drinking value and return home from the security guards, who are police officers belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station C District District, dispatched to the site after receiving 112 a report; and (c) stated that “I do not have the width age, whether I do not have it or not, you have to spawd”; and (d) assaulted the body of the Defendant with both hand by making a brush, flap, bat, bat, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] the obstruction of performance of official duties [Type 1]/ the coercion of official duties [the scope of the recommended area and the punishment of recommendation], the basic area of the recommendation [the scope of the recommendation area and the punishment of recommendation], six months to one year and six months;

2. The person appears to have committed any contingent crime under the influence of alcohol (fluoral circumstances).

Recognizing and opposing his mistake.

【Unfavorable circumstances】 Violence events against police officers are used.

There are several records of criminal punishment, such as imprisonment, etc.