업무방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
"2016 Highest 2865"
1. On January 16, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime against Victim C around 11:10, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force over about 20 minutes by avoiding disturbance, such as bringing the disturbance to the victim’s restaurant operated by the victim C (V, 50 years of age) in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, for the purpose of drinking the victim’s bath, i.e., e., “d., why sprink is 4,000 won.”
"2016 Highest 3702"
2. Crimes against victim F;
가. 업무방해 피고인은 2016. 7. 18. 23:55경 서울 노원구 G에 있는 피해자 F이 운영하는 ‘H’ 식당에서, 술에 취해 신발을 신은 채로 좌식 테이블이 있는 실내에 들어와 아무런 이유 없이 위 식당 종업원 I에게 “씨발년, 썅년”이라고 욕설을 하고 위 I 피고인을 어르신이라고 부르지 않았다는 이유로 “씹팔년, 썅년”이라고 큰 소리로 욕설을 하고 테이블 위에 있던 수저통 뚜껑을 들고 집어던지는 등 약 10분간 소란을 피워 위력으로 피해자의 식당 영업 업무를 방해하였다.
B. The Defendant causing property damage, at the same time, at a place as stated in the above Paragraph 1. Paragraph, and at the same time, under the influence of alcohol, caused the disturbance, and lids on a restaurant table, lids of the water reservoir in a restaurant table, and damaged the above coolant, which is the victim’s possession, by shouldering the front glass of the cooling conditioning for business use, so that the amount of repair costs can be caused.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police statement to I;
1. C’s statement;
1. Application of statutes on site photographs, site photographs, and CCTV photographs;
1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The Criminal Act;