When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 3, 2015, around 13:30 on February 13, 2015, the Defendant argued that “C, D, and lease deposit issues are disputed in front of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and F, a police officer belonging to the Incheon Southern Police Station E District Police Station, dispatched to the site with the above C’s report, “C and D were pushed down, so strong punishment may be imposed,” and C and D were arrested as flagrant offender.

However, there was no fact that C and D had been involved in the defendant.

As a result, the defendant and C and D were arrested for the purpose of having criminal punishment imposed on them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 157, 153 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confessions;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.