beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.04.18 2013고단183

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 18:00 on January 17, 2013, driven a hurburged car B by business, and was in the intersection where the traffic signal installed at the intersection was sent to the Gu-U.S. Purged B from the south-U.S. C (the age of 26) driving to the port of the right side of the said hurged car, one-lane of the two-lanes in the south-U.S. C C (the age of 26) driving at the right side of the said hurged hurged car, and the traffic signal installed at the intersection was sent to the Gu-U.S. Purged B to the port of the right side of the said hurged car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence injury to the above C, i.e., an injury to the 5-day right fingers first, the bones of the bones of the first mady, and injury to the victim E (the 31 years of age), who is the passenger of the above cargo tower, accompanied by a non-alley felball that requires medical treatment for about 12 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, reports on actual condition investigation, and photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against Victims E with heavier penalty);

1. Selection of selective fines for punishment (including the fact that there is no past record of criminal punishment, the fact that motor vehicle comprehensive insurance is subscribed to, and the fact that all victims agreed to do so);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.