However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 18, 2014, at around 01:30 on August 18, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, such as: (a) the victim F, who was working in the direction room in front of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant reported by the Defendant to dispute with the her mother, and was called out by the victim F, “if there is a fluorous voice because he is another guest in the her motherel, he would be a fluoring voice; (b) the victim’s f, who was fluoring another guest in the E zone of the Seosan Police Station E zone,” and threatening the victim to “fluoring her face,” and flading the victim’s face, flading the her flab by drinking the fat.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the dispatch duty of 112 report, and at the same time, the defendant conducted a long-term 14-day medical treatment and a multi-clateral test of the light and light.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] General In the basic area (referring to four months to one year and six months) (referring to a person subject to special mitigation) / In the case of obstruction of performance of official duties (referring to a sentence of sentence / In the case of a police official dispatched after receiving a report] / In the case of violence by a police official dispatched by a defendant, obstructing the performance of duties of the victim and obstructing the victim's injury at the same time, and the quality of the crime is not good. The fact that the defendant has been punished several times, including a crime related to violence, is disadvantageous to the defendant, and the extent of the victim's injury is not excessive, and that it is favorable to the defendant.

The above circumstances are as follows.