However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 11, 2016, the Defendant driven the 1-2m alcohol-based 0.183% alcohol-based e.g., under the influence of alcohol at the 1-2m section from the point where the 222-month light village 2 was parked in the 204 apartment complex located in the 204 apartment complex, to the point where approximately 1-2m later from the place where the 1-2m later was parked in the 204 apartment complex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44-2 (1) (Options of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the Defendant, even though he/she had a number of times of drinking and a licenseless driving, was driving at once without any special reason.

However, it is reasonable to consider that the defendant shows an attitude against the defendant, and that the defendant does not drive drinking.

In addition to the above points, the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be considered, and the sentence shall be determined as per the order.