2. While the Defendants made a confession and reflect on the crime, the crime of this case was committed by Defendant A, jointly with Defendant B and C, or by cutting the agricultural electric wire on their own, and was stolen on the vehicle. The method of crime is planned and interviewed by Defendant A, and the frequency of the crime is considerably high, and the damage is considerably high (the amount of KRW 27.9 million in case of Defendant A, KRW 6.6 times in case of Defendant B), the damage is not recovered, the damage is not recovered, and the damage was inflicted on agriculture, etc. Further, the Defendants committed the crime of this case during the period of each repeated crime, even though they were punished by imprisonment with prison labor due to the same veterinary act in combination with Defendant B and C, and Defendant A committed the crime of this case during the period of each repeated crime, Defendant A committed the crime of this case during the same criminal act, and Defendant B had the same criminal records three times and the same kind of criminal records once, and the circumstances and circumstances leading up to the crime of this case’s criminal acts, including the following circumstances and circumstances, etc.

3. The appeal by the Defendants is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.