When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 25, 2016, the Defendant does not investigate only four police officers who were dispatched to the Republic of Korea on March 25, 2016 at the C main office located in B at the time of 01:00 on March 25, 2016, and do not investigate them.

At the same time, the police officer was assaulted by the police officer at the site to keep the disturbance from the scene.

Appellants asserted that around 01:50 on March 25, 2016, and around 22-lane 21 of the Mool War Pool-si, the police officer visited him and visited him with D, along with his denial, in the said area. “A police officer assaulted Na.”

The police station is different from the police officer who was working in a situation where he / she gets to go to the police station and gets to go to the police station."

“I wanting to hear, see, and see the horses, and “I request the criminal care of the police station and the receipt of reports d. 112.” and, while under the influence of approximately 25 minutes, I expressed very rough and scamous words and actions at the government office by very rough words and actions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes for reporting on investigation, such as a rooftop screen CD, field photo, and each investigation report;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, and the selection of fines under Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;