손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following “2. height” and thus, it is acceptable by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the second part of the judgment, from 14 to 17, shall be reversed as follows.
The Defendants, a licensed real estate agent, introduced the Plaintiff as the remaining apartment in this case to purchase the right to sell the apartment in this case. However, the apartment in this case is not the south, and if the Plaintiff knew of such fact, the Plaintiff would not purchase the right to sell the apartment in this case. After that, the Plaintiff attempted to sell the apartment in this case even in salt, but did not sell it, and the market price of the apartment in this case was continuously lowered. Therefore, the Defendants caused damages to the Plaintiff due to the negligence of acting as a broker by providing wrong information. Accordingly, the Defendants jointly and severally, pursuant to Article 30 of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act, are obliged to compensate the Plaintiff for damages for damages incurred to the Plaintiff from December 9, 2015, which is the sale date of the apartment in this case, taking into account the decline in the market price of the apartment in this case and the disputes between the Plaintiff and the Defendants.
3. The judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all of the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.