However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

From December 24, 2007, the Defendant entered into a check contract in the name of the branch office of the national bank and the Defendant’s management C, and has traded the check number.

On May 4, 2012, the Defendant issued a check number E, check amount of KRW 9,00,000, and one copy of the check number per bank in the name of the stock company C, which is the date of issuance, on November 30, 2012, at the Defendant’s office located in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Seoul, and issued a check number of KRW 157,90,00,00,00, and one copy of the check number per bank under the name of the stock company C, which is the date of issuance, and on November 30, 2012, the check was presented to the above bank business support center during the period of payment, but did not receive deposits due to the shortage of deposits, as shown in the attached crime list, from around that time to November 8, 2012. The Defendant issued each check number of KRW 157,99,000,000,000 for each time during the period of payment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a copy of a complaint);

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act concerning a crime, Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Control of Illegal Check of Punishment

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The total amount of the checks on default in the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is 150,000,000 won, but the amount is not specified. However, a considerable portion of the checks issued prior to prosecution is recovered, the defendant is the primary offender, and the defendant seems to have caused each of the crimes of this case due to the company's deterioration in management, the defendant's mistake is recognized and seriously contradictory to the defendant, and other factors of sentencing such as the defendant's age, family relationship, occupation, etc. shall