A. The ground for the claim for indication: Defendant C received 30 million won from the Plaintiff and acquired it by deceit, on August 19, 2008, to the effect that “I will engage in the game business in the Philippines, and if you invest KRW 30 million, I may recover the house at auction with the profit of KRW 100 million within one year.”

Grounds: Judgment by service by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3)3). 2. The Plaintiff’s judgment as to Defendant B’s claim in collusion with Defendant C.

1.(a)

Although it is alleged that the plaintiff acquired 30 million won from the plaintiff as described in the paragraph, it is not sufficient to recognize that the defendant B conspireds with the defendant C only with the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 2, 3, and 4, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(M) In light of the above, the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant B by asserting that the defendant B conspireds with the defendant C that the plaintiff acquired 30 million won from the plaintiff, but the prosecutor was subject to a disposition taken by the prosecutor for lack of evidence. 3. As such, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C is reasonable, and the claim against the defendant B is dismissed as there is no reasonable ground.