A. Although the act of the Defendant and the respondent for attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) against the victim C by asserting a mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles was beyond the intention to regard the victim’s act as an expression of patriotism against his father and the content of the act was on the extension of the content of the indecent act by force against the other victims, the lower court acquitted the victim C of the charges of this case by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime of indecent act by force.

B. The court below's decision on the grounds of unfair sentencing (two years of imprisonment with labor for one year and two years of suspended sentence) is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. 1) The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (a) around 07:00 on May 2012, 2012, and around 07:00, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force by force against C (hereinafter “victim”) who is a pro-child to whom he can enjoy in his own room at the Defendant’s home (hereinafter “victim,” 14 years of age, hereinafter “victim”).

B) Around 22:00 as of June 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim was able to take part in the bed at the bed at the same place; and (b) committed an indecent act against the victim by force on his her her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son at the same place at around 23:00 on the same day; (c) the Defendant reported that the victim was able to take part in the bed at the bed at the bed at the same place; and (d) the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by force on his her son’s her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son at the same place at the same time.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim's relatives by force.

2..