However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant operated CMaintenance Foundation D in the old and American City, and around 2014, D was incorporated into E business, and the defendant refused to deliver D while raising an objection to compensation against the Korea Water Resources Corporation, which was an executive company.

F and G took charge of the defendant's compensation at the time of the employee of the Korea Water Resources Corporation.

H is a chief secretary of the law firm I who filed a building delivery lawsuit against the Defendant at the Korea Water Resources Corporation (Tgu District Court 2014 Gadan 6851) and appointed as a litigation agent by filing a lawsuit against the Defendant.

J took charge of removal D as a staff member of K Co., Ltd., a contractor of the E business.

On December 1, 2016, the Defendant prepared a written complaint to H, F, G, and J with D, and had L, a high school creator, move the contents of the written complaint to D protocol, as it is, and submitted a written complaint to the public official in charge of receipt and submission by the public service offices of the Daegu District Public Prosecutor's Office Kimcheon-ro 33, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, 2017.

A written complaint refers to ① false statement that H deems it necessary to prepare a written consent to withdraw a lawsuit regarding the delivery of the building in question, and the document stating “N” in the address column of “Gumi M” and “N” and “A” in contact column, which does not have been delegated by the Defendant with the head of the Defendant’s personal seal impression and the certificate of the personal seal impression issued on July 1, 2014. The confirmation person’s name is forged “A”, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of the Defendant’s name, for the purpose of using the Defendant’s personal seal impression affixed on the name of “A” to the name of “A” and to use the Defendant’s personal seal impression affixed on the part of the confirmation person’s name until seeking a place for the transfer of the building in question. ② On the back of the written agreement, J presented the written agreement to the effect that the Defendant keep the facilities in custody within D and received the Defendant’s signature and seal affixed on the “name A” column, and there was no initial agreement on the date of removal and transfer.