When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person shall issue a transaction instruction in electronic financial transactions or transfer or take over any means of access, such as an electronic card, to secure the authenticity and accuracy of the details of the transaction with users and other persons, or lend any means of access with compensation or in return for any compensation.

During the Internet search, the Defendant confirmed a notice stating that “I will provide money to lend a passbook that is traded in small amount on the Internet Baduk game.” If I talk with a person who published the relevant letter and a Kakao Stockholm, and borrowed a passbook from the other party between one month and the other party, I heard the answer that I would offer KRW 1,500,000 per one passbook, and tried to lend the account opened in the name of the accused to the other party.

On November 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened a new passbook and body card in the new bank account “B” and “C” account; and (b) lent the means of access to the Kwikset Service Articles who sent the passbook solicitation books on the front side of the Bcheon Station with the delivery of each passbook, body card and password to receive compensation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 49(4)2 and Article 6(3)2 of the former Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning criminal facts (Amended by Act No. 12837, Oct. 15, 2014)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;