폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
O) Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one year and six months.
However, the above punishment shall be imposed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. A. On September 28, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury, deadly weapons, etc.) committed two strings where it is difficult to identify the treatment period of the victim’s head by putting him/her at a cafeteria “F” restaurant located in the Gyeonggi-si in the operation of D, Kim Jong-si, while having a dispute with the victim B (38 years of age) who was working in the workplace, and having been in a dispute with the victim B (the 38 years of age).
B. The Defendant interfered with business by force, such as: (a) cutting the misunderstandings and cups, which were placed on the tables at the same time and at the same place; (b) cutting the disturbance on the floor; and (c) making customers at the same place get out of it, thereby interfering with the victim D’s main business operations by force.
2. Defendant B interfered with the victim D’s main store business by force by force, such as: (a) the time and time as described in paragraph 1-B; (b) the misunderstandings, cups, etc. on the floor of the said table; and (c) the scams, scams, etc. on the floor; and (d) the scams, etc. on the scams, scams, etc. on the floor
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Statement of suspect interrogation against the Defendants
1. Written statements of D;
1. On-site photographs;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;
1. Article 3(1) and Article 2(1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business, the choice of imprisonment), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;
1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes (Defendant A);
1. Discretionary mitigation (Defendant A) Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act:
1. Punishment to suspend the sentence (Defendant B) 1,00,000 won;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act (Defendant B).