However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 07:00 on October 30, 2016, at C main points located in Changwon Mapopopospospospospospospospospospospospospos B, and (b) reported that the victim D, who performed drinking, intended to breath alcohol; and (c) took two beercinspospospospospospospospospospospospospospospospospospospospospospospospos, which are dangerous articles in the table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D prepared by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the written diagnosis of injury to D;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Jan. 1, 201; Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Apr. 2, 201)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;