around 14:00 on December 16, 2014, the Defendant, at the first floor coffee shop in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, told the victim G to request the Internet portal site to display the “Internet Day Search Advertisement” on behalf of the Defendant, and said that the contract deposit of KRW 30,000,000, out of KRW 60,000,000, would be placed on the front line deposit advertisement.

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to act as an advertising agency.

Around December 18, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 30,000,000 won from the new bank account (Account Number H) in the name of the Defendant from the victim under the pretext of advance payment.

around August 19, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 2,156,00,00 from the victim’s new bank account in the name of K on the same day, on the same day. The Defendant received KRW 2,156,00 from the victim’s bank account on the same day.

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to create the Internet homepage normally.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim, thereby deceiving 2,156,00 won from the victim.

On April 7, 2015, the Defendant posted an advertisement stating “I will act as I will act as I will act as I would act as I would act for I would Work for I would Work for I would Work for I would Work for I would Work for I would Work for I would Work for I Work for I would Work for I Work for I Work for A.I.).” On the same day, the Defendant received KRW 715,000 from the victim’s account in the name of the Defendant.

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the victim, he/she shall be exposed to the advertising key for one month in the fifth order of the NAV search.