A. At the time of mistake of facts, the Defendant was missing and did not deem that the instant juvenile entered the house.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact that the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (700,000 won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들, 특히 E이 수사기관에서 피고인이 묵은지 삼겹살을 가져다 줄 때 D와 함께 있었는데 피고인이 D의 신분증을 검사하지 아니하였다고 진술한 점(E은 평소 피고인이 운영하는 가게를 자주 이용하였고, 수사기관에서 본 사건과 관련하여 자신 때문에 괜히 피고인이 피해를 보는 것 같아 죄송하다고 진술하기도 하였는바, 피고인에게 불리하게 허위의 진술을 하는 것으로 보이지 아니한다)에 비추어 보면, 피고인이 청소년인 D가 가게 안으로 들어와 E과 함께 있는 것을 보고도 연령을 확인하지 아니한 채 청소년유해약물인 소주를 판매한 사실이 충분히 인정된다.

In the same purport, it is reasonable that the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, and there is no error by mistake of facts as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

B. The Defendant’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing is an initial offender who has no record of criminal punishment.

However, in light of the legislative intent of the Juvenile Protection Act that enables juveniles to grow up into a sound character by protecting juveniles from harmful environment, the defendant's liability for selling liquor to juveniles can not be denied without confirming his/her identification card.

In addition, sentencing, such as the age, character and conduct, the environment, the motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime.