2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

The Defendant is a person who operates the “C Innsan City” in B.

From February 16, 2014 to May 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had his employee D have his employee D engage in sexual intercourse over several times, and (b) had his/her employee D engage in sexual intercourse with his/her name, 70,000 won, 100,000 won, and 1.50,000 won per hour; and (c) had his/her employee D engage in sexual intercourse with his/her name, thereby arranging sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police on D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, photographs, descriptions in investigation reports (in the face of 92 investigation records), or images;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 and Article 2 (1) 2 (a) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. [Incompetence] of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. is that the period of business and operating profits are not much specified, and the previous convictions (concompetence