2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. On January 1, 2008, the Plaintiff joined B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “instant company”) and worked in the air conditioners and air conditioners.

On May 12, 2010, the Plaintiff temporarily suspended from office under the left-hand shoulder operation due to the injury to the shoulder and the upper part of the above arms and the power lines, while performing the flading operation on Alumin I/CK on May 12, 2010, and was reinstated to the business division on March 14, 201, and was in charge of the supply and logistics overall affairs of the “vehicle, the upper part of the car, the inventory management, and the customer pen.”

B. As a result of repeated release of weight of 7 and 15km each day by 300 through 500 times, the Plaintiff appeared to have been exposed to the price of a material deposited by the left shoulder in the course of leaving the shower around June 15, 2013 ( Saturdays), etc., due to the aggravation of symptoms, and it was difficult to pulmonate the new wall due to the aggravation of symptoms, and transferred to the first-lane Joseon University Hospital for the same month, the Plaintiff received an application for medical treatment from the Defendant on the ground that it was objectively confirmed in accordance with the result of examination of stress on the part of the left shoulderer, etc. (hereinafter “instant medical treatment record”). However, the Defendant received an application for medical treatment from the Defendant on the ground that there was no confirmation of proximate causal relation between the Defendant and the medical treatment record on the ground that he/she was found to have been subject to examination and treatment on the part of the first-class hospital.

C. On November 19, 2013, the Plaintiff is dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for examination with the president of the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation.