On August 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months in the early branch of the Chuncheon District Court for fraud, and on August 20, 2015, the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 20, 2015. On November 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court.

On November 2014, the Defendant stated that “A” at the main point of “D’ operated by the Defendant at the Seocho-si, Gangwon-si, Gangwon-si, the Defendant would pay interest to the Victim E if he/she would have paid to him/her the money that he/she has, but now, would have paid to him/her, and the principal would have paid to him/her within two months.”

However, the defendant had no intention or ability to repay the principal by the due date, even though he borrowed money from the damaged person due to economic circumstances such as being liable for a large amount of debt to the large number of debtors at the time.

On December 9, 2014, the Defendant received two million won in cash from the injured party as a loan from the above main point of view around December 9, 2014, as well as from around that time to January 9, 2015, the Defendant received a total of nine million won from the injured party, such as the one in the attached Table 1 of the daily list of crimes, once every four times.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property to the victim by deceiving the victim.

On May 2014, the Defendant stated that “I want to operate D points, and I wish to pay I million won with the acquisition cost, I will immediately pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will pay I will do.

However, the Defendant had no intention or ability to repay the monthly income in a timely manner, even if he/she borrowed money from the damaged party, such as using most of the monthly income in repayment of the principal and interest of the above obligation, because the Defendant is liable to pay a large amount of the liability to the multiple obligors at the time.

Nevertheless, the defendant belongs to this.