When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 14, 2015, the Defendant participated in the “Korean Workers’ Competition” organized by the Korean Democratic Labor Union Federation (E; hereinafter “Civil Labor Union”) at the Seoul Square located in 15:40, Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, as the chairperson of the DD under the public transportation labor union.

The above assembly was a prior assembly of the “labor” sector among the public assemblies planned by the headquarters of the General Stopter (F) of the public sector, which was launched by the lead of the public sector.

The total of 66,00 people who participated in each sector's prior assembly, including the above "Korean Workers' Congress", had entered into a luminous square with the view of occupying the world as a type, paper, etc. after the completion of each prior assembly under the name of "the luminous plaza" to run.

In the above process, the Defendant occupied the lane prior to the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Loteral with the participants in a large number of assemblies at around 16:58 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with the participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic on land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Data about photographs of illegal actors;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal investigation;

1. The pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 185(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines (as a result of each evidence in its holding, immediately after the assembly of this case, the state that the traffic of each of the above roads was significantly difficult as soon as the demonstration cost was occupied in front of the Seoul Square, as stated in the facts constituting the crime, or occupied the three-way lane prior to the Jongno-gu Seoul Square, or opened a driving force prohibited by each luminous erosion.

The decision is judged.

Even if there are circumstances such as controlling roads near the scene in order to prevent a participant who deviates from the scope reported at the time by the police, it is reasonable to view it as a result of the defendant and other participants from remarkably off the way reported by the participants in the assembly.

another.