However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 2, 2014, at around 06:20, the Defendant driven a D low-speed car under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 500 meters from the roads front of the mutual infinite finite in the salary-to-Eup in the Seocho-gu, Pakistan-si, Pakistan-si, to the front of the salary-to-Seoul High School located in the salary-to-Seoul High School (Seoul High School) in the form of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.232%.

2. On November 2, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, as indicated in the preceding paragraph, while driving a motor vehicle with D low alcohol level of 0.232% under the influence of alcohol, and driving the motor vehicle at the 0.232% of the blood alcohol level, and driving the intersection in front of the Dobongcheon High School located in the salarycheon-gu, Youngcheon High School at the Ycheon-gu, Youngcheon High School at the jurisdiction of the Sinju City. However, the Defendant caused the injury of the victim E (e.g., the victim E (e., the 59-year-old) driving from the Seoul Sea to the Geumcheon-do under the influence of alcohol due to occupational negligence proceeding in violation of the stop signal while driving the motor vehicle at the direction of the Defendant’s low-speed driver’s license and causing the victim to suffer the injury, such as salt dumping in need of light treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. A traffic accident report, a traffic accident report, on-site photographs, and closures of the accident video;

1. Notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving, and the report on the state of drinking drivers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the main driving point, the choice of imprisonment), Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) 1 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of occupational injury, the selection of imprisonment without

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and (2), and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] are general.