However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 30, 2016, at around 01:15, the Defendant assaulted D’s breast part of D’s chest by her hand, “I am bling off, I am bling off, I am bling off, I am blish, I am blish, I am blish, I am blish, I am blish, I am blish, I am blish, I am blish, and we am blish between D’s bridges, and you am blick, I am blish, and I am am blish.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Each police protocol against D and F (the defendant is merely a unilateral assault committed by a police officer, and did not commit an act of obstructing the performance of official duties. However, according to the evidence in the judgment, the facts charged are found guilty, and the testimony of E and G, which seems to conform to the contents of the defendant's defense, cannot be believed in light of the relationship between the defendant and the defendant's defense and the relation between the defendant and the defendant'

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The range of sentencing guidelines for sentencing that does not reflect on a crime even though it is not good that a third party who has no record of being punished or sentenced to a punishment for the same kind of crime for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act participates in the process of drinking driving investigation conducted by a third party who has no record of being sentenced to such punishment, shall be limited to six months: - One year and four months (the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties, obstruction