However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around March 2018, the Defendant altered an official document by changing the term of validity of a regular inspection of D (former E) 25.5 tons of dump trucks owned by the Defendant at the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu Suwon-gu Building C, as of September 29, 2017, and even if it did not undergo a regular inspection after that date, the term of validity of the inspection among the construction machinery inspection column for construction machinery registration and inspection certificate of E’s construction machinery registration and inspection as of October 18, 2016; and the term of validity, “ October 29, 2017” as of October 18, 2017, using a kacker-kick and a test color pen and attaching it to the inspection column for D construction machinery registration and inspection.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant altered one copy of registration and inspection certificate of construction machinery in the name of the M&C market.

2. On March 2018, the Defendant submitted a modified public document by facsimile a certificate of registration and inspection of construction machinery, which is an altered public document, to the person in charge of the F in charge of the F in charge of the settlement bank, in the process of confirming the validity of inspection of equipment in relation to the equipment contract entered into with the F in charge of the settlement bank.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the altered official document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing registration and inspection certificates of construction machinery;

1. Articles 225 and 229 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order is that the defendant is aware of the crime and wrong.

There is no criminal offense exceeding a fine against the defendant.

In addition, the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of crime, and circumstances after crime, etc.