However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Cenz motor vehicle.

On March 5, 2016, around 18:20, the Defendant continued four-lanes of the entrances of the water level, which is located in 28-29, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, with the head of the water level at the boundary of the Seocho-gu, Seoul, and the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, along the four-lanes of the water level at the rapid speed.

At the time, the front door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door and door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, and safe operation of steering system and brake system to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not accurately operate the steering gear and brakes without accurately operating the steering gear and brakes, and by negligence, was driven by the victim D(i) E, which was temporarily stopped in the front section of the vehicle at the front section of the instant benz car, and received the back part of the passenger car as the front part of the said Benz car.

As a result, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the chills that need to be treated for approximately two weeks, and suffered injury to the victim F (F (FF, 38 years old) who was boarding the said i30 vehicle, such as salt, tensions, and tensions that require approximately two weeks medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant, even though the said i30 vehicle was damaged to be 754,327 won for repair, such as the exchange of chills, failed to immediately stop the vehicle and escape without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A survey report on actual condition and an accident scene photograph;

1. Application of each written diagnosis and written estimate under Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts (the point of view of failing to take measures after an accident) of the same Act;

1. Commercial concurrence;