On June 28, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.) at the Daegu District Court on June 28, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ansan Prison on June 7, 2013.

"2014 Highest 4429"

1. Around 19:20 on May 31, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective violence, deadly weapons, etc.) committed assault by the victim D (A) located in the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as 60 years of age) on the following grounds: (a) the victim refused to provide credit alcohol to the victim; (b) the victim refused to do so; (c) the victim refused to do so; and (d) the victim was bread with the hand of the victim at one time; and (d) the beer, which is a dangerous object on the table, was collected to the victim; and (e) the victim was breading the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object to follow the victim’s escape from the restaurant.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business by force for about 20 minutes, such as assaulting the victim on the ground that the victim D does not cause any credit, at the time and place of Paragraph 1, and 20 minutes of the crime, booming the beer’s disease, leaving the beer, leaving the customers out, etc., thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant operation.

3. The Defendant assaulted D at the time and place set forth in Paragraph 1 of this Article, and then requested D to assist the victim F (years 65) who is her husband, and when the victim arrived at the restaurant and resisted the Defendant, the victim was boomed up the floor to the be pushed down, and the victim was fluent by hand when the face of the victim was taken up by drinking.

On June 15, 2014, the Defendant, “2014 Highest 4769, the Defendant, at around 00:05, 00:05, was in a fluent horse with no name in Daegu Northern-gu G, stating that, while having fluences with the victim in relation to her jobs, the Defendant had been working for the victim on the ground that her was frequently moving her fluences with the victim, she would have been working for the victim, and that she would have been working for the victim.”