When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 17, 2013, from around 01:30 to 02:30 the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business activities of the Defendant by forcing six customers, who drinked in the table of “E” operated by the victim D (50 years of age) located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, to leave so as to make the Defendant and three customers, who are the business owners, come too early, to be imprecing, thereby interfering with the business activities of the Defendant by force, on the ground that: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (e) the Defendant was flicked so as to be flick; (e) the Defendant, within the “E”; and (e) the he was able to do so; and (e) the he was able to enter the business place; and (e) the Defendant was able to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on witness D's legal statement;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;