난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasons why the court accepted the judgment of the court of first instance for this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the third, tenth, and seventeen (17) of the judgment of the court of first instance are used as follows. Thus, they are cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Supplementary part] ① At the time of the refugee interview, the Plaintiff stated that “the family members who carried out traditional religions died due to the Malocle’s low interest, and she was found to have received a permanent low interest from the person who believed Malocle as she refused to succeed to the president’s position.” The Plaintiff’s above statement contents are difficult to confirm the substance objectively.
On the other hand, even if based on the plaintiff's statement, it is difficult for village residents to understand the reasons why the 15th anniversary of the death of the son who was the president.
As such, it is difficult to believe the Plaintiff’s statement content or assertion itself.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.