도박개장
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, for a defendant B to eight months, and for a defendant C to ten months, respectively.
(b).
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A was issued a summary order of KRW 200,000 as a crime of gambling at the Busan District Court on June 14, 1982; on May 12, 1995, a summary order of KRW 1 million was issued as a crime of gambling at the same court on May 12, 1995; on December 18, 1996, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 8 months for the crime of opening gambling; on June 16, 2008, the same court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million as a crime of opening gambling; on September 29, 2009, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 10 million as a crime of gambling at the Changwon District Court on December 10, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 10 million as a crime of opening gambling at the same court on September 29, 209.
Defendant
A around September 24, 2013, around 17:30 on September 24, 2013, around 17:30, ordered Defendant C and B to take the goods necessary for gambling, such as chairs, raw water, fences, tides, and bombs, into the G points of the operation of the Gangseo-gu Busan EF located in Gangseo-gu, Busan, and Defendant C and B prepared to keep the goods necessary for gambling within the above G points in a state where they can be kept for gambling.
After that, at around 21:30 up to 23:30 of the same day, Defendant A had approximately 20 customers (the total amount of gambling funds that he possesses by himself: about 100 million won) attend, and had customers take up the so-called so-called "total book" in the way of obtaining the multiple of the betting amount by a high number of clean persons among 50,000,000, using about 20,000,000 won per capita 20, and then, Defendant A acquired 10% of the sales amount as commission, and Defendant C and B considered the network around the above G main store to avoid crackdown.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to open a place for gambling for profit-making purposes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Protocol concerning the suspect examination of the defendant A by the prosecution;
1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the defendant B;
1. A copy of each police statement made to H and I;
1. Application of seizure protocol copies and Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Criminal facts;