성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (two years of suspended sentence in April and eight hours of community service order in the community service order in the community service order in the community service order in the community service order in the community service order in the community
2. The crime of arranging sexual traffic in this case, which is judged, is a serious criminal that has a great illegality that harms the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and that the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, is disadvantageous to the defendant.
However, in light of the fact that the Defendant recognized the crime at the lower court, and reflects the business period, the shorter business period, the size of the Defendant’s business, the degree of participation in the crime, the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the age of the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., the sentence of the lower court cannot be deemed unfair because its punishment is too uneasible.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit.