However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 04:55 on July 12, 2014, the Defendant stated that “I am her clothes from delivery in front of the Yak-ro, Songpa-gu, Seoul, the Defendant was urged by C to return home from the security guards belonging to the Seoul Songpa-gu Police Station B police box, who was dispatched after receiving 112 a report, and that “I am her clothes. I am she will interfere with the locker. I am her hing. I am hing off. I am hing off. I am hing off. I am hing off. I am the rear part of the above C. I am back on his hand, her hand, and assaulted the Defendant by saluting the salpt.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of the sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] Crimes of obstruction of the performance of official duties, and obstruction of the performance of official duties [decision of the recommended field] mitigation area (in cases where the degree of violence is minor] - 8 months

2. The decision of sentence shall be made in accordance with the text, taking into consideration the overall circumstances shown in pleadings, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation, intelligence and environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and others, such as the fact that the defendant is led to confession and is against himself, there is no history of punishment imposed or beyond the fine for the