A. On July 6, 2012, the Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction association under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), which completed the establishment registration on July 25, 2012, for the purpose of promoting the reconstruction project of the Housing Reconstruction Association in Yangcheon-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant rearrangement zone”), including real estate listed in the attached Table 2, by the head of Yangcheon-gu Office.

The Defendants are those who own each of the relevant real estate in the attached Table 1 column.

B. On September 4, 2012, the Plaintiff’s maximum consent to the establishment of an association and the Plaintiff’s right to demand sale (1) on September 4, 2012, Article 39 of the Urban Improvement Act and the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings (hereinafter “Aggregate

(3) Defendant E, F, H, and S (hereinafter “Defendant E, etc.”) who sent a written peremptory notice to the effect that there was an intent to participate in the reconstruction project by joining the association pursuant to Article 48 within two months, and that the said written peremptory notice was sent within two months, but the said content certification was returned.

2) Defendant B et al. (hereinafter “Defendant B et al.”)

(2) On January 4, 2013, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit on January 4, 2013, while exercising the right to demand sale under Article 39 of the Act on the Maintenance of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions, and expressed to Defendant E, etc., for whom the notice has not arrived at, the Defendant E, etc., who received the notice, expressed that the delivery of the copy of the instant complaint would substitute for the said peremptory notice.

3) The copy of the instant complaint is “the delivery date of the duplicate of the complaint” as shown in attached Table 2 (hereinafter “the delivery date of the copy of the instant complaint”).

) The notice was served to each of the Defendants on the date of entry (the fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap 1 and 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings.