Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

A victim B is a person who operates Da located in Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the defendant is an employee of the above D.

From February 28, 2019, the Defendant, from the victim on February 28, 2019, was notified that the said D factory will be suspended and that the goods in the said D factory will be arranged, and the victim was willing to interfere with the operation of the said factory for the purpose of receiving unpaid wages.

1. The Defendant committed the crime of February 28, 2019, at the above D factory on February 28, 2019, parked a car of 08:30 above D, at the entrance of the above factory, with a car of chip E and a car of Fribe, thereby preventing the victim from entering the factory to transport the steel products stored in the above factory, thereby hindering the victim’s factory operation by force.

2. On March 7, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime of March 7, 2019, around 07:00, obstructed the victim’s factory operation by force, by closing the iron door at the entrance of the said factory, binding the iron door, and correcting it into the key, thereby preventing the victim from entering the factory.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Part of the police interrogation protocol of the defendant

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Investigation report (to submit and attach on-site photographs of the complainant) (Judgment on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel);

1. The alleged defendant and his defense counsel, with regard to Paragraph 1 of the facts charged, asserts that: (a) in relation to Paragraph 1 of the facts charged, a vehicle was parked at the entrance of the factory to resist the victim with regard to unpaid wages, but there was no time to prevent the access to the factory of bitler or use power; and (b) in relation to Paragraph 2 of the facts charged, the victim corrected the entrance of the factory so that he could not transport the product, but

2. Determination

A. 1 The argument is based on the evidence of judgment.