On September 14, 2016, around 09:30 on September 14, 2016, the Defendant, in front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stolen one box of 29,000 won at the market price, which is the victim’s possession, where the victim was parked in the vehicle for cargo of the victim C, who was parked therein by taking advantage of the gaps in the surrounding surveillance negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of control manual and ctv output photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, the reasons for sentencing choice of imprisonment;

1. From four months to eight months of imprisonment on the sentencing criteria (the basic area of larceny in general property); and

2. The Defendant, who was sentenced to the sentence of larceny of the same kind in the past, was sentenced four times or more as punishment, and was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment due to larceny, and was sentenced to a fine and again sentenced to a fine, the Defendant committed the larceny in the first instance, and again committed the instant crime even though he was in the appellate trial.

The defendant still does not seem to repent of his mistake due to the petition, but did not recover from damage.

Although the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is minor, the defendant's severe punishment is inevitable, and the punishment is determined as per the disposition.