However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 19, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daejeon District Court, which became final and conclusive on October 9, 2009. On October 13, 2009, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million was issued for the same crime, and confirmed on December 4, 2009. On November 3, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and became final and conclusive on December 23, 2009.

On October 20, 2016, at around 21:50, the Defendant, without a car driver’s license, driven approximately 500 meters from the front side of the main apartment complex located in the large exhibition Jung-gu culture Dong to the front side of cultural development in the same Dong, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.093% of the blood alcohol concentration without a car driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the drinking driving control, the details of crackdown, and the circumstantial statement of the drinking driver;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Previous records of judgment: The application of criminal records, repeated statements, and statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the following grounds: (a) although the crime of this case was repeated despite the fact of the crime committed four times as a result of the crime of the same kind, it is necessary to acknowledge and reflect the fact of the crime and not repeat the crime; (b) consider the age

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;