If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On April 26, 2012, at around 22:30, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol at “C” located in Mapo-gu Seoul, and was under the influence of 112, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and was under the control of the franchisor E from the slope E of the D Zone in Mapo-gu Police Station, the Defendant called “this franchisoring business where the franchis are increased; (b) the Defendant was under the control of the franchisor; and (c) the Defendant was under the control of the franchisor E, and was under the control of the franchisor E at one time by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by police officers on crime control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial entry of the police suspect examination protocol against the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning police statements to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;