명예훼손
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
1. On May 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on May 13, 2015, the facts charged in the instant case involving a mutually infinite knive restaurant located in the Daegu-gu Seosan-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) the victim D, operating the restaurant called “C”, did not have a sexual intercourse with other people; and (c) even though there was no verification as to the authenticity thereof, the Defendant did not have to confirm the authenticity of the facts charged, the Defendant, at the same place with the neighboring residents E, “C restaurant D has multiple finites and goes together.”
By speaking to the purport that “the honor of a victim was damaged by publicly alleging false facts.”
2. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial for judgment is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on evidence with probative value that makes a judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt as to the defendant's guilt, it is inevitable to determine the defendant's interest as the defendant's interest (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2001Do2823, Aug. 21, 2001; 2008Do4467, Jul. 24, 2008).
As shown in the above facts charged, each statement of D's legal statement, accusation statement, and police statement protocol, F's legal statement and police statement protocol are recorded as evidence.
In doing so, each of the above statements made by E to D “D gue, gue, and misunderstanding and joining.”
The phrase “A” or “A” calls for E to the word “A”, and “A” stated from the investigative stage to the present court that there is no memory from the Defendant. However, even if D and F’s respective statements were to be true, that is, even if D and F’s above statements were to be made from E, the Defendant merely makes such statements against D.