If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Poter cargo vehicles.

On December 3, 2019, at around 13:20 on December 3, 2019, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle and proceeded to turn to the left at a speed unspeeded from the 2nd eth eth eth eth eth rith eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth

Since the location is where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, by neglecting this, the victim E was driving on the right side from the left side of the moving direction due to the negligence of left-hand turn on the red signal, and the victim E was driving on the right side, and the front part of the vehicle was shocked in front of the left side of the cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim E, such as salt ties, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment by occupational negligence, and suffered injury to the dong G and H, respectively, in light of the trend that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as salt ties and tensions, and suffered injury to I for about three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report and diagnosis report;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to Relevant Acts and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the degree of negligence of the defendant, age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, etc. in light of the circumstance of the sentencing of the case, and the degree of negligence of the defendant, character and conduct, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, etc. Therefore, the summary order