2. The defendant-Counterclaim plaintiff's counterclaim brought at the trial.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 23, 2012, the Defendant concluded a new long-term lease contract with the Plaintiff. From May 23, 2012 to July 13, 2012, the Defendant leased and used a vehicle number B car for KRW 550,000 on a monthly rent from May 23, 2012 to July 13, 2012, and entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff and a vehicle number C car number C car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) on July 13, 2012 from July 13, 2012 to July 13, 2016, and acquired the instant vehicle on the same day by setting the lease period as the lease period.

B. On March 4, 2013, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff the monthly rent of KRW 550,000 and KRW 550,000 for the monthly rent for the 2,750,000 and B automobiles, and returned the instant vehicle to the Defendant on March 4, 2013.

C. Monthly rent in arrears until the vehicle in this case is returned to the Defendant is KRW 329,00 for 20 days, and KRW 3,975,480 for 3,304,480 for 20 days for 20 days for 20 days for 20 days for 20 days for 20 days for 3,975,480 for 20 days for 3,304,480 for 200 for 2,750,000 for 2,750 for 3,54,480 for 3,813,935 for 20 days for 20 days for 20,000 for 20 days for 20,000 for 20 days for 20,000 for 20 days for 20,000 for 20 days for 20,000 for 3,813,935 for 20 days for 20 days for x 213 days for 】

[Based on the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, 11 through 13 (including each number if there is a serial number), Eul evidence Nos. 4 through 6, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the argument as to the cause of the main claim 2. According to the above recognition facts, the defendant operated Eul and the instant vehicle from May 23, 2012 to March 4, 2013 according to the above car siren contract, and the above contract is the defendant's rental fee, overdue return, and voluntary return.