When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 10, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on August 18, 2015 by imprisonment with prison labor for violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) at the Suwon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 18, 2015.

Around 16:00 on May 1, 2013, the Defendant prepared and submitted a false list of property in which there is no property, even though he/she owns C Abdop XD car under the name of the Defendant, in the case of the Daejeon District Court Decision 2013Kao294, 7-No. 2013, 200, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Daejeon District Court 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police on D;

1. Investigative report (in case A is a suspect, he is admitted to the detention center and the result of inquiry about liability insurance);

1. Previous convictions as stated in the judgment: Criminal history records, investigation reports (verification during the continuation of a separate detention judgment), report on the results of confirmation of the previous disposition, application of each Act or subordinate statute recorded in the judgment (U.S. District Court 2015 order 1624, 2827 (Consolidation);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 68 (9) of the Civil Execution Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the defendant's creditor for the reason of the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order, is desired to punish the defendant; the defendant has been punished more than 12 times (one time of actual punishment, five times of suspended sentence of imprisonment, and six times of fine) due to the crime of immigration; on the other hand, the defendant is against the defendant's recognition of the crime; the violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint conflict) in which the judgment becomes final and conclusive; and the crime of this case is concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the punishment should be determined at the same time taking into account the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc.