2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected, and that it appears to have cooperated with the investigation of relevant crimes.

On the other hand, however, narcotics-related crimes are highly harmful to society due to toxicity, and the defendant has already been punished several times due to the same kind of crime, while the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period is considered as disadvantageous to the defendant. In addition, there is no special circumstance or circumstance that can be newly considered in the sentencing after the sentence of the court below. The sentencing of the court below seems to be a result of reflecting the favorable circumstances for the defendant. In full view of the balance with the criminal punishment for other crimes similar to each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, character, character, occupation and environment, occupation and family relationship, the circumstances and results of each of the crimes of this case, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for the sentencing as shown in the arguments and the records, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.