성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the Defendants is unreasonable because each of the lower court’s punishments against the Defendants is too unreasonable.
2. There are circumstances in which the Defendants are against the mistake of the Defendants.
However, the Defendants are running a specialized sexual traffic business establishment by leasing officetels, and the nature of the crime is not good. Defendant A, as the owner of the business, has a heavy degree of participation in the crime, and Defendant B was sentenced to a fine on one occasion for the same crime.
In addition, considering the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, health status, criminal records, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, all of the sentencing circumstances in the records are not unfair because all of the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.
3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.