2. Determination

A. The lower court determined as follows, based on the following circumstances: (a) the victim stated that “the victim was aware of the content that “the victim was using electricity of the Defendant without permission from his/her residents”; (b) G and F stated that “the victim was “the victim was using electricity without permission”; and (c) the Defendant alleged that “the victim was using electricity, etc. without permission,” as stated in the criminal facts consistently held until the court of the lower judgment; and (d) the Defendant alleged that “the victim was using electricity, etc. without permission; and (e) the victim was forced to spread it to H et al.”, the lower court acknowledged that “the victim’s reputation was damaged by pointing false facts as indicated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the lower court.”

B. In a thorough examination of the records of the above deliberation, the court below is justified in finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the ground of the above circumstances, and there is an error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the defendant.

shall not be determined.

(c)

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.