마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.
1. On October 11, 2013, the Defendant transferred KRW 400,000,000 from the corporate bank account (Account Number: D) in the name of the Defendant, to the new bank account in the name of F, the mother of E used by E, who transferred KRW 400,000,000,000 psychotropic drugs, to the psychotropic drugs, and received approximately 0.3g of phiphones contained in the H “H” telephone located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the 12th of the same month.
Accordingly, the defendant purchased approximately 0.3g 400,000 won from E.
2. On October 12, 2013, at around 19:43, the Defendant wired KRW 400,000 from the above F’s account in the name of the Defendant to the above F’s new bank account used by E, and on October 13, 2013, the Defendant received approximately KRW 0.3g of the philopon, which is 0.3g of the Defendant’s Gablon, fran in front of the Defendant’s house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.
Accordingly, the defendant purchased approximately 0.3g 400,000 won from E.
3. On October 26, 2013, at around 00:43, the Defendant wired KRW 400,000,000 from the above bank account in the name of the Defendant to the above bank account in the above F’s name used by E, and then, around 22:00 on the same day, the Defendant received approximately 0.3g of the philopopon from the “K” telecom in Geumcheon-gu Seoul J to the paper.
Accordingly, the defendant purchased approximately 0.3g 400,000 won from E.
4. On November 27, 2013, at around 13:42, the Defendant wired KRW 400,000 from the above bank account in the name of the Defendant to the above bank account in the above F’s name used by E, and received approximately 0.3g of opon from E at the “L” telecom in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul.
Accordingly, the defendant purchased approximately 0.3g 400,000 won from E.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each prosecutor's protocol of suspect examination of the accused (including E substitute interrogation part);
1. Prosecutions for M.