beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2020.07.22 2020고단508

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who violates the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) runs a marina business in the name of "C" in Chuncheon City B;

No one shall commit any act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. for business purposes.

Nevertheless, on January 9, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30, 2020, Mazz. (hereinafter referred to as “Mazz.”); (b) had 100,000 won from E, a customer, through D, and arranged sexual traffic so that he/she may engage in sexual intercourse with F (F, female, 23 years of age) and F (F, 23 years of age) who is the nationality of his/her mother, in six times; and (c) on January 12, 2020, the Defendant received 170,000 won from G, the customer, who is a national of Thai (H, female, 28 years of age) and sexual intercourse, and arranged sexual intercourse with his/her employees from September 12, 2019 to January 12, 202, in collusion with F (F, female, 23 years of age) to arrange sexual intercourses (i.e., sexual intercourses).

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

A. From November 2019 to January 9, 2020, the Defendant violated the Immigration Control Act by employing F, a foreign national of the Thailand, who did not have the status of sojourn eligible to engage in job-seeking activities after entering the said marina business establishment, as the status of visa exemption (B-1).

B. On January 12, 2020, the Defendant employed H, a foreigner of the nationality of the mother country, who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for visa exemption (B-1), as a massage, at the said marina business establishment, and was in violation of the Immigration Control Act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of F, D, E, H, and G;

1. Each police officer;