except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 19, 2014, around 19:55, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim by force, resulting in disturbance, such as leaving a satin kin, which is operated by the victim D(23 years of age) located in Ansan-si Group C, on the ground that customers are satisfing, and having a satisfy, and having a satfy in front of the customer, thereby obstructing the victim’s business affairs by force.

2. The Defendant, at the above date and time, and at the same place as mentioned above D’s 112 report, took her home out from F of the police box belonging to the Police Station of the Ansan-gu Police Station, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of 112 report by committing assault to F, such as: (a) she took a bath to her home home from F of the police box belonging to the Police Station of the Ansan-gu Police Station; and (b) she took the her face of the said F; (c) she puts drinking on the face of the said F; and (d) she her knee with her bucks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement made to F and D;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) that reflects the mistake of the defendant, victim D of interference with business does not want the punishment of the defendant